<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WCAG 2 response on relative units</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alastairc.ac/2007/02/wcag-2-response-on-relative-units/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alastairc.ac/2007/02/wcag-2-response-on-relative-units/</link>
	<description>Kything web interactions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:24:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: WCAG Samurai Errata Review &#171; WCAG Samurai Peer Review</title>
		<link>http://alastairc.ac/2007/02/wcag-2-response-on-relative-units/comment-page-1/#comment-16552</link>
		<dc:creator>WCAG Samurai Errata Review &#171; WCAG Samurai Peer Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 06:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alastairc.ac/2007/02/wcag-2-reponse-on-relative-units/#comment-16552</guid>
		<description>[...] I mention that the WCAG 2 process actually took my comments on board? (Well, partially.) I have a feeling that the best approach is really a testing process rather than [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I mention that the WCAG 2 process actually took my comments on board? (Well, partially.) I have a feeling that the best approach is really a testing process rather than [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlastairC</title>
		<link>http://alastairc.ac/2007/02/wcag-2-response-on-relative-units/comment-page-1/#comment-13936</link>
		<dc:creator>AlastairC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 08:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alastairc.ac/2007/02/wcag-2-reponse-on-relative-units/#comment-13936</guid>
		<description>Hi Christophe, 

Thanks for that, it looks like the linking issues have been resolved, I was not able to follow some of the links.

It looks like this is the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/WD-WCAG20-20070220/Overview.html#visual-audio-contrast-scale&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;new inclusion&lt;/a&gt; in that draft.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Christophe, </p>
<p>Thanks for that, it looks like the linking issues have been resolved, I was not able to follow some of the links.</p>
<p>It looks like this is the <a href="http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/WD-WCAG20-20070220/Overview.html#visual-audio-contrast-scale" rel="nofollow">new inclusion</a> in that draft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christophe Strobbe</title>
		<link>http://alastairc.ac/2007/02/wcag-2-response-on-relative-units/comment-page-1/#comment-13925</link>
		<dc:creator>Christophe Strobbe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 22:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alastairc.ac/2007/02/wcag-2-reponse-on-relative-units/#comment-13925</guid>
		<description>Hi Alastair,
Do you mean you cannot get directly to the issue with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/issue-tracking/viewdata_individual.php?id=1437&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this URL&lt;/a&gt;?

Never mind who team B is. The WCAG Working Group set up three parallel teams to work on proposal to close the last call issues; each team tackled a different set of success criteria and brought its proposals to the working group for discussion. The intention was to use the working groups resources more efficiently.

The &quot;Working Group Notes&quot; are just for internal discussions; the actual response to the submitter of a comment is always in the &quot;Resolution&quot; section.

The new success criteria are currently only available in an &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/WD-WCAG20-20070220/Overview.html#visual-audio-contrast&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;editor&#039;s draft&lt;/a&gt;&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Alastair,<br />
Do you mean you cannot get directly to the issue with <a href="http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/issue-tracking/viewdata_individual.php?id=1437" rel="nofollow">this URL</a>?</p>
<p>Never mind who team B is. The WCAG Working Group set up three parallel teams to work on proposal to close the last call issues; each team tackled a different set of success criteria and brought its proposals to the working group for discussion. The intention was to use the working groups resources more efficiently.</p>
<p>The &#8220;Working Group Notes&#8221; are just for internal discussions; the actual response to the submitter of a comment is always in the &#8220;Resolution&#8221; section.</p>
<p>The new success criteria are currently only available in an &#8220;<a href="http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/WD-WCAG20-20070220/Overview.html#visual-audio-contrast" rel="nofollow">editor&#8217;s draft</a>&#8220;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
