<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why does google use CAPTCHA?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alastairc.ac/2006/12/why-does-google-use-captcha/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alastairc.ac/2006/12/why-does-google-use-captcha/</link>
	<description>Kything web interactions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 21:13:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShaQ</title>
		<link>http://alastairc.ac/2006/12/why-does-google-use-captcha/comment-page-1/#comment-124688</link>
		<dc:creator>ShaQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alastairc.ac/2006/12/why-does-google-use-captcha/#comment-124688</guid>
		<description>With Experience with Blocking spam, using these other methods that you mention are too restrictive and flag False Positives (Positives being Spam). Web presences like Microsoft, Google, Yahoo, Alta-Vista cannot risk blocking out a SINGLE valid user in the name of blocking out ALL spam.

In Programming Languages/Type Inference, The solution needs to be Complete but need not be Sound. It has been proven that you CANNOT (At least Very Difficult) have a Sound solution, that is ALSO complete. For Large Scale problems like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Experience with Blocking spam, using these other methods that you mention are too restrictive and flag False Positives (Positives being Spam). Web presences like Microsoft, Google, Yahoo, Alta-Vista cannot risk blocking out a SINGLE valid user in the name of blocking out ALL spam.</p>
<p>In Programming Languages/Type Inference, The solution needs to be Complete but need not be Sound. It has been proven that you CANNOT (At least Very Difficult) have a Sound solution, that is ALSO complete. For Large Scale problems like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlastairC</title>
		<link>http://alastairc.ac/2006/12/why-does-google-use-captcha/comment-page-1/#comment-107828</link>
		<dc:creator>AlastairC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 18:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alastairc.ac/2006/12/why-does-google-use-captcha/#comment-107828</guid>
		<description>Hi Hamid,

I don&#039;t think you quite understood, I wasn&#039;t saying anything about their search.

Google actually does block robot style behaviour on their search, but with an error page based on your IP address rather than a CAPTCHA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Hamid,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think you quite understood, I wasn&#8217;t saying anything about their search.</p>
<p>Google actually does block robot style behaviour on their search, but with an error page based on your IP address rather than a CAPTCHA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hamid</title>
		<link>http://alastairc.ac/2006/12/why-does-google-use-captcha/comment-page-1/#comment-107612</link>
		<dc:creator>hamid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 17:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alastairc.ac/2006/12/why-does-google-use-captcha/#comment-107612</guid>
		<description>I dont think that using Akismet like system on Google Search back end would be a better option.

Let me explain,
Just have a look around, and evey at your searching pattern and what you search, most of the searches on google appear to be spam. For example: a nob may search &#039;Hello World&#039;, or his website name, or its own name etc.

Similar is the case when a person tries to search a phrase that seem just like a Spam phrase but in actual its not span or BOT. He just need it, and if Google block him, Google will loose 1 user.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont think that using Akismet like system on Google Search back end would be a better option.</p>
<p>Let me explain,<br />
Just have a look around, and evey at your searching pattern and what you search, most of the searches on google appear to be spam. For example: a nob may search &#8216;Hello World&#8217;, or his website name, or its own name etc.</p>
<p>Similar is the case when a person tries to search a phrase that seem just like a Spam phrase but in actual its not span or BOT. He just need it, and if Google block him, Google will loose 1 user.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Gray</title>
		<link>http://alastairc.ac/2006/12/why-does-google-use-captcha/comment-page-1/#comment-103994</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alastairc.ac/2006/12/why-does-google-use-captcha/#comment-103994</guid>
		<description>Instead of captcha, what about something like the following, which is quick and easy, and hard for a bot to get past...

To Continue Answer the following:

Bob married Sally.  Sally&#039;s mom is Sarah.  Sarah is Bob&#039;s ______.

A. brother
B. father in law
C. step son
D. mother in law
E. grandfather
F. dog
G. lover

Obviously the correct answer is either D or G, but how would the bot figure that out?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instead of captcha, what about something like the following, which is quick and easy, and hard for a bot to get past&#8230;</p>
<p>To Continue Answer the following:</p>
<p>Bob married Sally.  Sally&#8217;s mom is Sarah.  Sarah is Bob&#8217;s ______.</p>
<p>A. brother<br />
B. father in law<br />
C. step son<br />
D. mother in law<br />
E. grandfather<br />
F. dog<br />
G. lover</p>
<p>Obviously the correct answer is either D or G, but how would the bot figure that out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google censoring conservative political emails? &#171; Reformed Musings</title>
		<link>http://alastairc.ac/2006/12/why-does-google-use-captcha/comment-page-1/#comment-90279</link>
		<dc:creator>Google censoring conservative political emails? &#171; Reformed Musings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 22:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alastairc.ac/2006/12/why-does-google-use-captcha/#comment-90279</guid>
		<description>[...] to thwart spammers, they are easily and routinely cracked by universities and hackers. There are better alternatives. Nonetheless, I went to the web interface for Google mail to get things rolling again. I noticed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to thwart spammers, they are easily and routinely cracked by universities and hackers. There are better alternatives. Nonetheless, I went to the web interface for Google mail to get things rolling again. I noticed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlastairC</title>
		<link>http://alastairc.ac/2006/12/why-does-google-use-captcha/comment-page-1/#comment-80758</link>
		<dc:creator>AlastairC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 07:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alastairc.ac/2006/12/why-does-google-use-captcha/#comment-80758</guid>
		<description>Hi Aby,

You&#039;ve pretty much missed the point of the article really. There isn&#039;t such a thing as a good CAPTCHA,and looking at yours hasn&#039;t changed my mind.

Apart from just having one modality, the images aren&#039;t that hard to read, meaning they will be easliy crackable.

If I were to use a CAPTCHA service, it would be &lt;a href=&quot;http://recaptcha.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;recaptcha.net&lt;/a&gt;, as it offers an audio equivalent and works for a good cause.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Aby,</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve pretty much missed the point of the article really. There isn&#8217;t such a thing as a good CAPTCHA,and looking at yours hasn&#8217;t changed my mind.</p>
<p>Apart from just having one modality, the images aren&#8217;t that hard to read, meaning they will be easliy crackable.</p>
<p>If I were to use a CAPTCHA service, it would be <a href="http://recaptcha.net/" rel="nofollow">recaptcha.net</a>, as it offers an audio equivalent and works for a good cause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aby</title>
		<link>http://alastairc.ac/2006/12/why-does-google-use-captcha/comment-page-1/#comment-80609</link>
		<dc:creator>aby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 02:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alastairc.ac/2006/12/why-does-google-use-captcha/#comment-80609</guid>
		<description>Captcha is a tool to distinguish between human and automated programs. Unfortunately most of the captcha are a burden to users. An ideal captcha should be easily readable to human and rarely understandable to hacker applications.  I have created such a captcha and published in my blog. I have a plan to establish it as a service. I.e. you can include it as a plug-in to your web site.  Please give your valuable comments regarding this.
http://www.codegeeks.net/captcha-using-aspnet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Captcha is a tool to distinguish between human and automated programs. Unfortunately most of the captcha are a burden to users. An ideal captcha should be easily readable to human and rarely understandable to hacker applications.  I have created such a captcha and published in my blog. I have a plan to establish it as a service. I.e. you can include it as a plug-in to your web site.  Please give your valuable comments regarding this.<br />
<a href="http://www.codegeeks.net/captcha-using-aspnet" rel="nofollow">http://www.codegeeks.net/captcha-using-aspnet</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlastairC</title>
		<link>http://alastairc.ac/2006/12/why-does-google-use-captcha/comment-page-1/#comment-62858</link>
		<dc:creator>AlastairC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alastairc.ac/2006/12/why-does-google-use-captcha/#comment-62858</guid>
		<description>Stats from testing a form with and without CAPTCHA showed a &lt;a href=&quot;http://marcelo.sampa.com/marcelo-calbucci/brave-tech-world/A-10-improvement-on-conversion-w.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;10% increase in (human) conversion&lt;/a&gt;.

They used certain rules that only showed a CAPTCHA in certain cases (&lt;1% of the time), but more most people they didn&#039;t have to use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stats from testing a form with and without CAPTCHA showed a <a href="http://marcelo.sampa.com/marcelo-calbucci/brave-tech-world/A-10-improvement-on-conversion-w.htm" rel="nofollow">10% increase in (human) conversion</a>.</p>
<p>They used certain rules that only showed a CAPTCHA in certain cases (&lt;1% of the time), but more most people they didn&#8217;t have to use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlastairC</title>
		<link>http://alastairc.ac/2006/12/why-does-google-use-captcha/comment-page-1/#comment-47409</link>
		<dc:creator>AlastairC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 08:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alastairc.ac/2006/12/why-does-google-use-captcha/#comment-47409</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;LIE!!!! It only breaks the Gimpy captcha.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That was just one example, more recently people have been &lt;a href=&quot;http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2007/07/08/spammers-overcome-hotmail-and-yahoo-captcha-systems/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;breaking Yahoo and Microsoft&#039;s CAPTCHA&lt;/a&gt;.

As for false positives, all of the systems will produce them to some extent, but my hit rate getting through CAPTCHA is about 1 in 2... less than the others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>LIE!!!! It only breaks the Gimpy captcha.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>That was just one example, more recently people have been <a href="http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2007/07/08/spammers-overcome-hotmail-and-yahoo-captcha-systems/" rel="nofollow">breaking Yahoo and Microsoft&#8217;s CAPTCHA</a>.</p>
<p>As for false positives, all of the systems will produce them to some extent, but my hit rate getting through CAPTCHA is about 1 in 2&#8230; less than the others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerry</title>
		<link>http://alastairc.ac/2006/12/why-does-google-use-captcha/comment-page-1/#comment-47377</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 02:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alastairc.ac/2006/12/why-does-google-use-captcha/#comment-47377</guid>
		<description>&gt; It is not effective. People have created systems to break it in 92% of cases.

LIE!!!! It only breaks the Gimpy captcha. At least read the damn article that you link to.

&gt; There are better methods.

WRONG!!!! Your &quot;better methods&quot; lead to false positives, which is the only thing that&#039;s worse than spam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; It is not effective. People have created systems to break it in 92% of cases.</p>
<p>LIE!!!! It only breaks the Gimpy captcha. At least read the damn article that you link to.</p>
<p>&gt; There are better methods.</p>
<p>WRONG!!!! Your &#8220;better methods&#8221; lead to false positives, which is the only thing that&#8217;s worse than spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
