<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Criteria for using Web 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alastairc.ac/2006/12/criteria-for-using-web-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alastairc.ac/2006/12/criteria-for-using-web-20/</link>
	<description>Kything web interactions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 05:33:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://alastairc.ac/2006/12/criteria-for-using-web-20/comment-page-1/#comment-8693</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 03:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alastairc.ac/2006/12/criteria-for-using-web-20/#comment-8693</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve hit it right on the head here, definitely well done.

The problem with Web 2.0 is people tend to be easily persuaded into this stigma that if it has flashing lights and looks shiny it must be incredible, which is simply not true. Without the smoke and mirrors, at the core you still need something worthwhile otherwise you&#039;ve got nothing. A lot of people forget that without content, the most incredible system is useless.

I&#039;m waiting for web3.0, it seems to be a lot more based on reality rather than redundant features.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve hit it right on the head here, definitely well done.</p>
<p>The problem with Web 2.0 is people tend to be easily persuaded into this stigma that if it has flashing lights and looks shiny it must be incredible, which is simply not true. Without the smoke and mirrors, at the core you still need something worthwhile otherwise you&#8217;ve got nothing. A lot of people forget that without content, the most incredible system is useless.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m waiting for web3.0, it seems to be a lot more based on reality rather than redundant features.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

