<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Raising the bar of mobile browsing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alastairc.ac/2006/10/mobile-browsing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alastairc.ac/2006/10/mobile-browsing/</link>
	<description>Kything web interactions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 05:33:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlastairC</title>
		<link>http://alastairc.ac/2006/10/mobile-browsing/comment-page-1/#comment-13401</link>
		<dc:creator>AlastairC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 16:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alastairc.ac/2006/10/mobile-browsing/#comment-13401</guid>
		<description>Hi Paul,

I&#039;ve seen that, but my point is that the guidelines (well, some of them anyway) don&#039;t apply in the way they were intended to these newer mobile browsers.

The guidelines were aimed at small screen devices with limited rendering that do things linearly (not completely dissimilar to text browsers or screen readers). 

When you add desktop rendering and zoom capability, you&#039;ve shifted the interaction style to something more like a desktop browser with a screen magnifier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Paul,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen that, but my point is that the guidelines (well, some of them anyway) don&#8217;t apply in the way they were intended to these newer mobile browsers.</p>
<p>The guidelines were aimed at small screen devices with limited rendering that do things linearly (not completely dissimilar to text browsers or screen readers). </p>
<p>When you add desktop rendering and zoom capability, you&#8217;ve shifted the interaction style to something more like a desktop browser with a screen magnifier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Walsh</title>
		<link>http://alastairc.ac/2006/10/mobile-browsing/comment-page-1/#comment-13381</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Walsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 16:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alastairc.ac/2006/10/mobile-browsing/#comment-13381</guid>
		<description>Alastair - take a look at the W3C Mobile Web Initiative [1]. It has created Best Practices to help developers create Web sites that work on desktop computers as well as mobile devices.

[1] http://w3.org/mobile

Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alastair &#8211; take a look at the W3C Mobile Web Initiative [1]. It has created Best Practices to help developers create Web sites that work on desktop computers as well as mobile devices.</p>
<p>[1] <a href="http://w3.org/mobile" rel="nofollow">http://w3.org/mobile</a></p>
<p>Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlastairC</title>
		<link>http://alastairc.ac/2006/10/mobile-browsing/comment-page-1/#comment-1900</link>
		<dc:creator>AlastairC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 18:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alastairc.ac/2006/10/mobile-browsing/#comment-1900</guid>
		<description>&quot;message codes it allows&quot;

Err, yes, um, I don&#039;t actually know myself yet! It&#039;s what ever the default Wordpress install allows, I haven&#039;t customised it yet. I&#039;ll find out and add something.

I&#039;m also going to add that subscribe the comments pluggin that Bruce Lawson uses as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;message codes it allows&#8221;</p>
<p>Err, yes, um, I don&#8217;t actually know myself yet! It&#8217;s what ever the default WordPress install allows, I haven&#8217;t customised it yet. I&#8217;ll find out and add something.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also going to add that subscribe the comments pluggin that Bruce Lawson uses as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben 'Cerbera' Millard</title>
		<link>http://alastairc.ac/2006/10/mobile-browsing/comment-page-1/#comment-1846</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben 'Cerbera' Millard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 01:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alastairc.ac/2006/10/mobile-browsing/#comment-1846</guid>
		<description>Non-standards-aware sites are probably using tables for layout and presentational markup, though! The screen stylesheet would normally just do fonts and colours...maybe the devs of some mobile browsers didn&#039;t realise us weirdos use CSS for layout. :-P

You&#039;re right that the &quot;Frankensteinesque&quot; [1] results in some mobiles are normally a result of half-applying the media=&quot;screen&quot; stylesheet, from what I&#039;ve seen.

Overriding all the layout stuff intended for desktop PCs in the media=&quot;handheld&quot; CSS cures a lot of this. Limiting the properties in this to colors, backgrounds and basic font styling means the stupid browsers don&#039;t end up rendering anything complicated enough to choke on.

However, it certainly is great to see how the mobile browsers of the past couple of years have raised the bar. You might also check Minimo [2] if you have access to a Windows Mobile device. It&#039;s basically Mozilla for mobiles.

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/web-forms-2/#r-to-html5
[2] http://www.mozilla.org/projects/minimo/

Btw, how about a little note near this message form saying what message codes it allows, if any?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Non-standards-aware sites are probably using tables for layout and presentational markup, though! The screen stylesheet would normally just do fonts and colours&#8230;maybe the devs of some mobile browsers didn&#8217;t realise us weirdos use CSS for layout. <img src='http://alastairc.ac/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>You&#8217;re right that the &#8220;Frankensteinesque&#8221; [1] results in some mobiles are normally a result of half-applying the media=&#8221;screen&#8221; stylesheet, from what I&#8217;ve seen.</p>
<p>Overriding all the layout stuff intended for desktop PCs in the media=&#8221;handheld&#8221; CSS cures a lot of this. Limiting the properties in this to colors, backgrounds and basic font styling means the stupid browsers don&#8217;t end up rendering anything complicated enough to choke on.</p>
<p>However, it certainly is great to see how the mobile browsers of the past couple of years have raised the bar. You might also check Minimo [2] if you have access to a Windows Mobile device. It&#8217;s basically Mozilla for mobiles.</p>
<p>[1] <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/web-forms-2/#r-to-html5" rel="nofollow">http://www.w3.org/TR/web-forms-2/#r-to-html5</a><br />
[2] <a href="http://www.mozilla.org/projects/minimo/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mozilla.org/projects/minimo/</a></p>
<p>Btw, how about a little note near this message form saying what message codes it allows, if any?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlastairC</title>
		<link>http://alastairc.ac/2006/10/mobile-browsing/comment-page-1/#comment-1809</link>
		<dc:creator>AlastairC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 14:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alastairc.ac/2006/10/mobile-browsing/#comment-1809</guid>
		<description>I guess the mobile browsers try and replicate the desktop rendering primarily because it works better for more sites (i.e. all the non-standards aware sites).

For those of us producing standards based sites, the old browsers are ok, and these two new ones are great.

However, there are only two mobile browsers I would consider testing with (and doing anything about), and mobile IE is not one of them! (It seems to suffer from the Frankenstein problem I mention above.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the mobile browsers try and replicate the desktop rendering primarily because it works better for more sites (i.e. all the non-standards aware sites).</p>
<p>For those of us producing standards based sites, the old browsers are ok, and these two new ones are great.</p>
<p>However, there are only two mobile browsers I would consider testing with (and doing anything about), and mobile IE is not one of them! (It seems to suffer from the Frankenstein problem I mention above.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben 'Cerbera' Millard</title>
		<link>http://alastairc.ac/2006/10/mobile-browsing/comment-page-1/#comment-1807</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben 'Cerbera' Millard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 14:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alastairc.ac/2006/10/mobile-browsing/#comment-1807</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had a casual interest in how the &quot;desktop web&quot; can work in handhelds since I convinced a friend to test Project Cerbera in one:
http://projectcerbera.com/misc/mobilesupport.html

This phone was old and had no noticable CSS support. It rendered the page a lot like a desktop browser at a narrow width with CSS turned off would do.

Since then I&#039;ve had other websites tested in mobile devices. The biggest problem seems to be that some try to render desktop layouts (media=&quot;screen&quot;) on their tiny display area:
http://www.gtaforums.com/index.php?showtopic=241170

I&#039;ve found that creating a handheld stylesheet (media=&quot;handheld&quot;) which overrides all the layout stuff of the main stylesheet can help with this.

I&#039;ve seen some really strange rendering errors in the mobile IE browser which I can&#039;t investigate since I don&#039;t have that browser available to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had a casual interest in how the &#8220;desktop web&#8221; can work in handhelds since I convinced a friend to test Project Cerbera in one:<br />
<a href="http://projectcerbera.com/misc/mobilesupport.html" rel="nofollow">http://projectcerbera.com/misc/mobilesupport.html</a></p>
<p>This phone was old and had no noticable CSS support. It rendered the page a lot like a desktop browser at a narrow width with CSS turned off would do.</p>
<p>Since then I&#8217;ve had other websites tested in mobile devices. The biggest problem seems to be that some try to render desktop layouts (media=&#8221;screen&#8221;) on their tiny display area:<br />
<a href="http://www.gtaforums.com/index.php?showtopic=241170" rel="nofollow">http://www.gtaforums.com/index.php?showtopic=241170</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve found that creating a handheld stylesheet (media=&#8221;handheld&#8221;) which overrides all the layout stuff of the main stylesheet can help with this.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen some really strange rendering errors in the mobile IE browser which I can&#8217;t investigate since I don&#8217;t have that browser available to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

